On Anger, Action, and Discussion

I am a proud Nerdfighter and generally agree with the musings of both great leaders and brothers, John and Hank Green. Frankly, they are intriguing individuals who tend to be far more eloquent and intelligent in their presentation and thought than I seem capable of. Accordingly, whenever any major issue comes up, I go to their various channels and social media feeds for a quick informative recap and jumping off point for future research and inquiry. Doing so a few days ago, I came across some of Hank’s posts on responding to ongoing events and how he chooses which to engage with and why. You can find the initial post here and Hank’s response clarifying his original post.

Now, I respect and understand where Hank Green is coming from, but, in this case, I sincerely believe it is a large pile of bullshit. Here’s the thing: Hank admits that he does not want to speak on particular issues (Ferguson, GamerGate, gun violence, etc.) as he has a personal stake and considers himself a member of some of the groups involved in the confrontations. While Hank might be considered to be as members of some of the groups he mentions in his post, he is not affected in any meaningful way by the harassment and violence that those involved in the issues he mentions are. In a sense, he has a certain level of privilege (I just threw up a little in my mouth writing that but there really is no better term available) because he can speak on these issues without accusations of self-interest or bias that accompany POC and female activists, protesters, writers, etc. It is one of the major reasons why allies, particularly cis, white, male allies, have been so important in the past as they are seen as somehow authorities or worthy of attention. (Sometimes people really piss me off)

Beyond this, Green mentions how he and his group try to research and show both sides in an equally reasonable manner. I applaud Mr. Green’s efforts, but there is not always multiple sides to an issue. Hell, many times there are not even two sides to an issue. It is possible for their to be reasonable ideas on two sides that have nothing to do with each other hence you have people arguing over two completely different things, but that is a rare exception. Just because you cannot find reasonable oppositions to an issue or position does not mean you should address it. After all, it’s completely possible that there is just nothing of value in the opposition.

When you have created a career off of having a platform and bullhorn to discuss major events and issues, current and historical, you pretty much have an obligation to use that bullhorn even when you believe there might be some unfair criticism thrown your way. Others have done it and have faced the consequences because it was the right thing to do. I can only hope that others can follow their brave lead.

2 thoughts on “On Anger, Action, and Discussion

  1. I guess I’m confused. You want this guy to take any controversial topic that exists? It seems well within his rights and duties to take up banners or open up conversations where he pleases. From my glance at his article and retraction, it looks like he earnestly feels unfit or uncomfortable to broach certain issues. Where’s the harm there?

    • Obviously, I cannot force anyone to take up any controversial topic or issue and he or she is free to do whatever they wish with their voice and resources. I am simply commenting and criticizing his reasons for not wanting to discuss these particular topics since he has talked about similar ones in the past. He states that he has a certain perspective and has already taken a side, essentially, so he would be arguing from a single perspective. Why is that a bad thing?

      He has already addressed the whole “Anger” thing, but I just disagree with his premise that anger is ultimately not useful.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s